SEARCH |
try another search
newswire international
coverage of life, politics and protest.
post your news instantly
upload your audio, video, photo or text directly from your browser
background in-depth
analysis on capitalism and global economics from znet
features: archive 9-11: peace & justice links about contact support us get involved volunteer up coming events imc video
projects IMC Channel
http://www.indymedia.org/
Australia adelaide melbourne sydney
Africa south africa congo nigeria
Europe austria barcelona belgium finland france germany czech republic italy norway portugal russia sweden switzerland united kingdom
Canada alberta hamilton maritimes montreal ontario québec vancouver victoria windsor
Argentina argentina
Brasil brasil
Colombia colombia
Israel israel
Mexico mexico chiapas
United
States arizona atlanta austin boston buffalo chicago cleveland danbury, ct hawaii houston la madison maine minneapolis/st. paul new jersey new mexico nyc new york capitol ohio valley philadelphia portland richmond rocky mountain san diego san francisco bay area seattle st louis urbana-champaign utah vermont dc
IMC Projects satellite tv news print radio climate IMC
IMC
Process process discussion tech volunteer mailinglists fbi/legal updates indymedia faq
IMC technlogy by cat@lyst and IMC Geeks
Get involved with the indymedia revolution at process.indymedia.org
|
webcast
news contribute an
article | administration
| This is an OPEN
PUBLISHING newswire
| email
this story | download as
PDF | print
article
World Bank
Prepares To "Do" Afghanistan (english) by K Davies 8:33am Sun Nov 18 '01 (Modified on
7:09pm Sun Nov 18 '01) |
|
|
'The World Bank argues that there are economic
advantages - not just military objectives - for investing
in the future of Afghanistan. "Where there could be a big
payoff down the line for the region around Afghanistan
will be options for transport, trade and energy," says
William Byrd, acting country manager for Afghanistan at
the World Bank.'
"Options for transport, trade and energy" translated into
plain language is OIL AND GAS PIPELINES. Here's another
interesting quote from the article at the URL below:
'"We don't want to go for state of art in the
beginning," says William Byrd, acting country manager for
Afghanistan at the World Bank. But he says a healthy financial
infrastructure will be needed to manage development, once the
more immediate emergencies such as food and shelter are eased.
"You need a central bank that works and finance and aid
management. You also need some basic building blocks - these
are all things to be kept in mind. It will be a difficult
task," Byrd said.'
http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/business/articles/eav111601.shtml
add
your own comments
| |
""Acting
Country Mananger?!!" (english) by a3m
9:13am Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
Isn't that nice. Somebody is minding the "store": for
Afghanistan. A personal banker just like the adds on t.v.
Not With bankers like this who needs wars and
enemies! | |
They're gonna
"do" Afghanistan, heh heh (english) by
Beavis 9:32am Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
Yes, it is juvenile but I can't help but ask "What Would
BBeavis and Butthead Say?" when I read the headline .,.
and it is weirdly appropriate.
| |
huh huh huh
(english) by Butthead 10:05am Sun Nov
18 '01 |
|
|
Yeah. They're gonna do it. huh huh huh. That would be
cool. | |
The World
Bank can "recycle" (english) by
skatesnksi 10:18am Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
That's just great news!
God forbid Afghanistan
reverts back to a self-sustaining, locally based economy which
existed before the US induced Soviet invasion....
The
World Bank can go to its recent archives and polish off the
(expensive) study it conduct in the late 90s for Big Oil,
analyzing the Afghan pipeline. As UNOCAL's VP Mr. Maresca
admitted before a congressional subcommittee on February 12,
1998:
"A recent study for the World Bank states that
the proposed pipeline from Central Asia across Afghanistan and
Pakistan to the Arabian Sea would provide more favorable
netbacks to oil producers through access to higher value
markets than those currently being accessed through the
traditional Baltic and Black Sea export routes.
This
is evidenced by the netback values producers will receive as
determined by the World Bank study."
| |
Pipeline
Sweepstakes (english) by KD 10:53am
Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
Some enterprising individual in Las Vegas should set up a
Pipeline Sweepstakes to take bets on which supranational oil
corporations, or consortium thereof, will get the contracts
for the pipelines.
Or maybe some enterprising
community group could do it and donate the profits to helping
Afghan refugees and victims of the bombing.
| |
My money
would be on Pennzoil (english) by
elfinity 11:24am Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
After all his son's hard work, you can be sure Daddy Bush's
Pennzoil will get a piece of the cake.
| |
Capatilist
Pigs! (english) by Sam 11:26am Sun
Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
How dare the west contemplate introducing foreign
investment into Afghanastan? If this happens the average
citizen might be able to earn a living wage and actually get
running water and a toilet. Heaven forbid they improve their
living standards.
Even though we all enjoy these
amenities the Afghani people should not be exposed to this
exploitation! They deserve to live in mud huts till the end of
days because we have decided this is good for them.
Thank god we of indymedia are looking out for their
best iterests and saving them from our higher standard of
living. | |
Let the
people decide (english) by iso truth
11:38am Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
Ok, sam, I'm wondering how someone from a country which has
just bombed what little public infrastructure which remains in
that country can speak of the aspirations for the people to
get running water and toilets.
Putting that aside,
ever wonder why a local and sustainable economy not reliant on
multinational oil companies might be preferable?
Ever
wonder if the Afghan people really aspire to owning more
STUFF?
Ever wonder if people living in "mudhuts" might
be more content than some egomaniac living in a 5000 square
foot egomansion? | |
Maybe I'm
stoopid but... (english) by Yer butt
11:44am Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
... Last I heard the afgani's where not to into being
colonized...But Sam we all know the world bank only has their
best INTEREST's in mind. | |
Ever wonder?
(english) by Sam 1:23pm Sun Nov 18
'01 |
|
|
"Ok, sam, I'm wondering how someone from a country
which has just bombed what little public infrastructure which
remains in that country can speak of the aspirations for the
people to get running water and toilets."
I'm
wondering how we can get the oppressive colonial Arabs out of
Afghanistan without bombing? I'm also wondering why so many
Afghani's welcome the bombing to gain their freedom and why
people like you want them to live under the rule of oppressive
fundamentalists bankrolled by Arabs?
"Putting that
aside, ever wonder why a local and sustainable economy not
reliant on multinational oil companies might be preferable?"
Conversely have you ever wondered how the economy you
allude to will appear? Will it come about spontaneously? Where
would the capital come from? Why don't the people of indymedia
show the "evil oil companies" how it is done and start the
economy you speak of? Or are they too busy marching around
playing bongos to really effect change? Maybe the reason is
the liberal left can't even organize themselves forget about a
nation. So I guess the oil companies will have to do it?
"Ever wonder if the Afghan people really aspire to
owning more STUFF?"
Ever wonder why you think they
would not aspire to own more “stuff”? Ever wonder why owning
more stuff is so bad? Ever wonder why you own a computer?
"Ever wonder if people living in "mudhuts" might be
more content than some egomaniac living in a 5000 square foot
egomansion?"
Ever wonder if the people of Afghanistan
might want to live in something they do not have to rebuild
every year? Ever wonder why if mud huts are so great you don't
live in one?
Ever wonder why you and others who share
your beliefs like to enjoy the fruits of capitalism but
automatically deny these amenities to those in the third
world?
Ever wonder why your beliefs are so out of line
with how you actually live?
| |
Absurd
(english) by MM 1:30pm Sun Nov 18
'01 |
|
|
Just the fat that the leaders of AMERICA is sitting in
WASHINGTHON and deciding how the new goverment is going to
look in AFGAHNISTAN says it all about how "just" this war
is.Oh well,atleast they are inviting some of the groups in
afgahnistan to be part of it,thats nice of them......
| |
Capital a
given? (english) by Jack Straw 1:34pm
Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
Ever wonder, Sam, why it is that anyone *needs* capital?
Probably not. You probably assume that capital is a given
feature of human society. In fact, capitalism, in which means
of producing our needs function as a sum of money that seeks
to expand itself via production (capital), did not exist
anywhere in the world till just a few hundred years ago. And
the vast majority of what is now known as the "underdeveloped
world" (strictly a capital-oriented perspective) survived well
enough on subsistence farming/grazing/gathering. It is
capital's global expansion that deliberately has made the vast
majority of the world's population unable to produce their own
needs (via measures such as Enclosures, pushing people off
their ancestral lands and turning it into private, ie
corporate, property)
But i wouldn't want you to think
too hard, Sam, or to read too much. History can be threatening
to one's preconceptions. | |
The past was
much better than the present! (english) by Sam 1:46pm Sun Nov 18 '01
|
|
|
"Ever wonder, Sam, why it is that anyone *needs*
capital?"
Sure! You need capital to move out of your
mud hut and live in a house with running water.
"You
probably assume that capital is a given feature of human
society."
No Actually I consider it to be an
advancement.
"In fact, capitalism, in which means of
producing our needs function as a sum of money that seeks to
expand itself via production (capital), did not exist anywhere
in the world till just a few hundred years ago."
Really? You mean it came about after the Industrial
Revolution? I had no idea!
"And the vast majority of
what is now known as the "underdeveloped world" (strictly a
capital-oriented perspective) survived well enough on
subsistence farming/grazing/gathering."
That is
amazing! So before capitalism there was no poverty, disparity
between nation states or disease? You mean it was utopia
before the evil capitalists changed it all? Have you ever
opened up a history book Skippy?
"It is capital's
global expansion that deliberately has made the vast majority
of the world's population unable to produce their own needs
(via measures such as Enclosures, pushing people off their
ancestral lands and turning it into private, ie corporate,
property)"
Wow! I had always thought that Global
Expansion improved the human condition for the vast majority
of people in the world? It actually set us all back! So we are
all worse off today than we were?
This is exactly what
the Taliban were saying! Look how nice they made society.
Perhaps we should all go back in time?
You read like a
comic book!
When are you moving into your mud hut so
you can live in your personal Utopia?
Hahahahahah! | |
Gee Sam I
am... (english) by Yer Butt (again)
2:13pm Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
If you haven't noticed future man....we,re on a industrial
time bomb. See ya on the other side Sammy!
| |
Capitalism
& Oil (english) by KD 2:41pm Sun
Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
The rise of corporate capitalism is synchronous with the
exponentially increasing use of fossil fuels, particularly
oil. The former can't exist without the latter. The problem
is, the latter can't continue for more than a few more years -
if that.
If people are better off due to what might be
more accurately described as "fossil capitalism," it's due to
exponentially increasing use of fossil fuels, and it's only in
a material sense. Family and community life have suffered
under fossil capitalism.
Once fossil fuels start their
inevitable exponential decline, the fossil fuel "pie" will
shrink exponentially. Corporations and people will be fighting
over smaller and smaller crumbs of the resource pie. This has
never happened before in human history, except locally. Now
it's global. It will get very ugly. Indeed, it's already
getting that way.
The poor people of Afghanistan, and
other nations that are located above deposits of fossil fuels,
or along pipeline routes for same, will see little benefit
from the extraction and transportation of those fuels. Fossil
fuel agriculture and the world's ravenous population of cars,
trucks and planes won't allow it.
The age of
profligate oil extraction and consumption that allowed some
oil nations to become rich in the past is over. They're
already in decline in advance of the decline of the resource
they sit on top of. Soon the entire global edifice of fossil
capitalism will follow those nations into decline.
| |
Let's answer
the question (english) by Sam 3:20pm
Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
No one has answered what the alternitive is to the oil
companys or the greedy capitalist designed banks going into
Afghanistan is? Well? Where are the WTO protestors or are they
too busy bailing each other out of jail following todays fun
and games in Canada?
It is time to show the evil
capitalists the way!
Where is your alternative? Or are
you too delusioned to admit that your are incapable of doing
anything other than a day of marching around and getting
arrested.
You will never be taken seriously until you
come up with another alternative. Until then you like everyone
else you sit in judgment of are part of the problem.
| |
Do you really
want to know? (english) by KD 4:08pm
Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
Sam, do you really want to know? Or do you just want to
defend the status quo and put down anyone who criticizes
it? | |
Tell me!
(english) by Sam 6:15pm Sun Nov 18
'01 |
|
|
I don't defend the status qou because I am the gatekeeper.
I am merely asking what the alternative is. In typical fashion
there is no answer. Maybe you should ask yourself why there is
no answer and why you people can't follow up your assertions
and belief with dialouge.
Note I don't mean dialouge
about dialouge, I mean what is your response.
| |
Play it
again, Sam (english) by iso truth
7:09pm Sun Nov 18 '01 |
|
|
"I'm wondering how we can get the oppressive colonial
Arabs out of Afghanistan without bombing? I'm also wondering
why so many Afghani's welcome the bombing to gain their
freedom and why people like you want them to live under the
rule of oppressive fundamentalists bankrolled by Arabs?"
The Taliban are largely Afghan natives. The "Afghanis"
also "welcomed" the Taliban in 1996. And no, I don't want
"them to live under the rule of oppressive fundamentalists"
who UNOCAL oil and the US State Department wined and dined at
lavish dinner parties in Houston back in 1997-98.
-------------------------------------------------------
"Conversely have you ever wondered how the economy you
allude to will appear? Will it come about spontaneously?"
No, it will "come about" the same way it always has:
the sweat equity of labor. As my favorite Republican President
said:
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital.
Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have
existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior
of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."
Lincoln's First Annual Message to Congress, December 3,
1861.
Where would the capital come from? Why don't
the people of indymedia show the "evil oil companies" how it
is done and start the economy you speak of? Or are they too
busy marching around playing bongos to really effect change?
Maybe the reason is the liberal left can't even organize
themselves forget about a nation. So I guess the oil companies
will have to do it?
------------------------------------------------
"Ever wonder why you think they would not aspire to
own more “stuff”? Ever wonder why owning more stuff is so
bad?"
I know it's beyond your horizon, but there is
powerful sentiment in the "third world" saying precisely that
they have no wish to emulate the "american way of life." And
"owning more stuff" is "bad" insofar as the disease of more is
destroying the planet and its peoples. Again, this stuff is
beyond your horizon. -------------------------------------
"Ever wonder why you own a computer? "
Because I
don't want to be stuck relying on corporate news and corporate
"entertainment."
---------------------------------------------- "Ever
wonder if the people of Afghanistan might want to live in
something they do not have to rebuild every year?"
Maybe the same reason overstuffed americans need to
buy new wardrobes and new cars every year?
------------------------------------------------------
"Ever wonder why if mud huts are so great you don't live
in one?"
Possibly due to the weather? Here in the
northern US, the "mud hut" never really caught on.
--------------------------------------------------
"Ever wonder why you and others who share your beliefs
like to enjoy the fruits of capitalism but automatically deny
these amenities to those in the third world?"
I'm not
"enjoying capitalism's fruit," but rather "enjoying" the
"fruit" of my own labor. And when I've had enough "fruit" to
eat, I don't keep gorging myself at the expense of others.
Moreover, the "third world" aren't demanding "amenities"
absent madison avenue advertising. In fact, "capitalists" like
Phil Knight seem to be "denying amenities" to "third world"
laborers when he denies them a living wage for honest work.
Finally, I believe EVERYONE should have food, shelter and
clothing, so spare me further rhetorical questions.
-------------------------------------- Ever wonder why
your beliefs are so out of line with how you actually live?
No. In fact I wake up every morning feeling GREAT
about being in alignment with my beliefs, and figuring how I
can get into an even better alignment. But thanks for asking,
just the same. Maybe Santa will bring you the book "Natural
Capitalism" so that you can crack your brain and learn about
alternatives to "dog eat dog" rape the planet economies. And
by the way, european countries are "socialist" but I don't see
them living in "mud huts" and they have more time off to enjoy
LIFE. So think about it.
| |
|